Contradictions, confusion - E-cigarette laws need to be reviewed

(This article is for reference only in some countries)

A medical report by the Royal College of Physicians has made a turning point by “encouraging” the use of e-cigarettes. And people need to understand that e-cigarettes are much safer than conventional cigarettes. However, the report also makes it clear that e-cigarettes are not the only “gateway” to quitting traditional cigarettes.

But, what is the problem here?

According to the social research, "Under the new law, e-cigarette advertising will be banned in print, on television and radio, while other regulations on nicotine liquids and flavors will still be introduced."

This is a very unfair and ridiculous practice for e-cigarettes as they are treated like traditional cigarettes and are subject to advertising restrictions. However, medical experts have found e-cigarettes to be an effective aid to quitting traditional cigarettes.

The confusion here is due to the design of the e-cigarette and its smoke. Others argue that the advertising is banned because the product contains nicotine . So why aren't potatoes banned because they contain nicotine? Although the biggest toxic substance in regular cigarettes comes from tar, e-cigarettes don't have any.

To address this issue in a politely requesting manner, representatives of many e-cigarette companies have spoken out: “If our product is deemed to be beneficial to the health of former smokers and, in fact, helping them quit completely; allow our industry and the businesses in it the breathing space to establish itself as you would any other reputable and responsible business.”